|
|
Post by Biomanic on Dec 4, 2008 17:09:10 GMT 10
I don't know, sorry.
|
|
|
|
Post by |εїз|Alice|&# on Dec 4, 2008 18:34:53 GMT 10
uh-huh
|
|
|
|
Post by Biomanic on Dec 4, 2008 20:00:37 GMT 10
Exactly
|
|
|
|
Post by Smallfry on Dec 5, 2008 14:56:40 GMT 10
aha?
|
|
|
|
Post by |εїз|Alice|&# on Dec 5, 2008 17:33:15 GMT 10
yeah thats right smallfry ^.^
|
|
|
|
Post by near on Dec 20, 2008 16:29:49 GMT 10
the worst way is 2 annonce the fact there is a silence when it isn't even akward Deffinalty that makes it so akward |
|
|
|
Post by Biomanic on Dec 20, 2008 22:38:08 GMT 10
You know, I think you are wrong, Announcing that there is an awkward silence, when there isn't, would relieve tension, and do the opposite. People are going to laugh at you. Especially if they notice. So, I think that'd be a good way to break an awkward silence, of course, either, the people would have to refuse that there is an awkward silence, and in doing that, deny it in there mind, and by doing that, hopefully forgetting the awkwardness and then laughing at the speaker, relieving the none existent awkwardness. Or, there not to be an awkward situation in the first place, meaning the hole endever is pointless, meaning that you'd not need to do it in the first place, but then again, only if there is not tension/awkwardness then the line works, but, if there isn't and you announce it, then you look like a freaking idiot, 'cause if there is, then everyone knows it.
In the end, my conclusion is... Use it if there isn't, if you can make your way threw the fact that'll only work if there is no awkwardness, and if there is, well then if you do, you look like a dumb arse.
|
|
|
|
Post by }]EtHAn[{ on Dec 21, 2008 16:08:00 GMT 10
um o long cant be bothed to read
|
|
|
|
Post by Biomanic on Dec 21, 2008 20:04:02 GMT 10
That was the point, it is basically pointless babbling.
|
|
|
|
Post by }]EtHAn[{ on Dec 21, 2008 22:42:17 GMT 10
nice work on spaming
|
|
